This post happens to coincide with Earth Day, yet the action and outrage for what I will describe here is not limited to one day.
Even if you don't call Minnesota home, you are likely familiar with the fight that has been ongoing over whether to allow mining near the boundary waters because this area in Northeast Minnesota bordering Canada is the most visited wilderness area in the entire United States. 675,000 public comments were submitted to the Forest Service in 2022, 95% of which favored protecting the boundary waters area from sulfide-ore copper mining. Yet, just a few days ago on April 16th 2026, the Senate went against the desire of the people by passing House Joint Resolution 140 (previously passing the House as well on January 21st, 2026).
Mining is not new to Minnesota, the state has a long history of iron ore mining. In fact, we're the number one producer of iron ore in the entire country, my paternal great-parents even running a boarding house, general store, and post office for miners in the area. Yet, sulfide mining has never been done in Minnesota before. Sulfide mining is generally considered one of the most toxic industries since it creates a runoff of sulfuric acid (basically battery acid) that makes the land and water surrounding the mine unlivable, and this acid also seeps into watersheds downstream, further expanding the damages reach. A study from March 2025, analyzed eight mines in Idaho, Washington, Michigan, Montana, Wisconsin, South Carolina, and Alaska to show that even with today's regulations they are "consistently polluting rivers, lakes, and groundwater." This is truly sad in any area of the country, and especially so in a place still so pristine such as the boundary waters where you can literally drink the water without filtering. "In addition to acidifying the lakes and rivers, the sulfuric acid leaches out heavy metals such as mercury, lead, arsenic, and other toxins. This type of mining is so toxic that there HAS NEVER BEEN A SULFIDE MINE THAT HAS NOT CONTAMINATED SURROUNDING WATER SOURCES." As if this irreparable ecological damage wasn't bad enough, if this sulfide mining is allowed to happen, it would also severely impact the recreation in the area, which contributes more than $19M annually and creates over 300 jobs, destroy the future for all of the fisherman and hunters who enjoy this area, and violate treaties protecting the hunting, fishing, and gathering rights of the Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, along with two other bands, all of whom were denied being part of the conversation.
I've been near the boundary waters and found it other worldly and serene. In fact, all of the pictures included in this post are ones I took on that trip to Grand Marais, Minnesota in the Summer of 2024, one of the towns near the entry point of the boundary waters area, sitting on Lake Superior where the downstream flow of contaminated water will head. My mom backpacked into the boundary waters in 2006, which she frequently mentions as being a life changing experience. And, my grandpa actually worked in the area in 1933, at age 23, for the Civilian Conservation Corps reforesting this heavy logged area during the Great Depression, an effort by President Roosevelt to put unemployed men to work (later the BWCA Wilderness Act passed by Congress in 1978 ended logging and snowmobiling use in the area, and restricted mining).
But, even if you don't have a connection, or haven't visited the area, these mines may already be affecting natural land near you (as noted in the study of eight mines in other parts of the US). And, if this administration is successful in using The Congressional Review Act to overturn regulations years beyond the 60 days the act allows, it could have dire impacts for other efforts this administration, or others with their same ideologies, will try in the future. While this is a huge setback, there are things we can still do. Litigation will be pursued, questioning the legality of what Congress did in. Minnesota leadership could deny state permits and/or pass state law to override this federal overreach. The impacted Native American tribes could push back. And, as a last line of defense, Minnesota residents would likely step in, akin to how we stood up for our state in January of February of this year.
To assist with the cost of legal efforts in the first, and most ideal, next line of defense against this mining, please consider donating to any of the organizations below. I have no affiliation with them, nor do I get anything if you do donate. I just wanted to personally share should you want to make your voice heard. Contacting representatives in Minnesota, even if you're out of state, will also be super important as the second line of defense will require state laws and permits to deny the mining company its move forward. And, of course, continuing to vote in leadership who is can actually show they have integrity and aren't just in a bunch of people's pockets.
Environmental Defense Fund - donate by tonight, April 22nd 2026, to triple the impact of your donation as it will be matched by two longtime EDF donors!
Friends of the Boundary Waters
Backcountry Hunters & Angler's Campfire Society
Mining in the boundary waters is just one of many environmental projects that this administration is set on creating detrimental damage with, oftentimes having ties to a monetary benefit/influence. The 2025 budget cancelled 350 environmental protection agency grants (as well as cancelled or paused any program with the keywords "equity" or "climate" from the Departments of Energy, Transportation, Agriculture, and the Interior, no matter whether closer inspection would show these programs had nothing to do with equity or climate in the way the administrations broad search intended), closed the offices of environmental justice, pulled data used by the public and many organizations for environmental mapping, paying a French company $1B in our taxpayer money to NOT build wind farms (so our money is literally being thrown away to stop a project this administration doesn't like), given the rubber stamp to pollute our air, and so much more.
Just like mining in the boundary waters, these decisions are not a done deal. If you'd like to support initiatives that are fighting against these larger environmental rollbacks, please consider looking into the below organizations...
Environmental Integrity Project
Environmental Protection Network
Natural Resources Defense Council
The ACLU is doing fantastic work fighting against other injustices as well.
If you're on the fence wondering whether your donation, protest, boycott, social media post, etc. will even make a difference, I find the 3.5% rule an interesting concept to think more about - every action, even those that are small, combine together into a larger movement and also get people thinking about taking additional steps that are more impactful than their initial step of marching in protest. In the years to come, I anticipate the actions taken by Minnesotans in the early months of 2026 will also be studied as an effective method of resistance as well.









